Blogging About Books

Who Do You Write Like?

2011-08-03T10:39:00.000-04:00

Find out by posting a sample of your writing to this "writing analyzer." I doubt it's scientific, but it is fun. Me? I write like Margaret Atwood - well, maybe in my dreams...

Here's the little story, originally posted to Genre Shorties on Gather, that I submitted to the analyzer. Not sure how it came up with Margaret Atwood - maybe I will take the bragging rights anyway!

I read about this at my friend's blog - Mary's Writing Nook.

If Casey Anthony Writes a Book

2011-07-18T18:03:00.002-04:00

There's been a lot of speculation that Casey Anthony will get rich writing a book about her daughter's death, the trial, and her family. I won't buy the book. I accept the verdict that set her free. No, I don't think she is innocent. I agree with the jury; the prosecution didn't prove what they said they were going to prove. They overcharged the case. If they had charged a lesser degree based on what they could prove, I'm convinced the verdict would have been guilty.

Still, you may wonder - why not buy the book? She hid Caylee's death from authorities. She let her daughter's body remain out in the elements rather than lay the child to rest with a proper burial. She may walk away from that legally, but I have no intention of putting money in her pocket, any more than I would have put money in OJ Simpson's pocket by purchasing his book.

If she does write a book, I'm sure the contents will be all over the Internet soon after it's released. Her version, which I believe would be mostly fiction, would be easy to learn without putting money in her pocket. I'm not sure I care anyway.

What about you? Would you buy Anthony's book?

The Taking by Dean Koontz

2011-01-01T14:01:00.002-05:00

The Taking by Dean Koontz

Bantam Dell

a division of Random House

Paperback 2005

410 pages

One dark and stormy night (do you see where this review is going?) the survival of mankind hangs by a thread as aliens invade earth. Only a few people have the fine qualities necessary to save the children and thus to insure the survival of human beings. Semen scented rain, dead bodies brought back to life zombie fashion, frightened wolves, and giant killer insects present the puzzles and obstacles faced by the righteous few. All is not lost since they have the aid of super intelligent dogs to guide them through the horrors they face. None of this was believable. The only thing I can't believe is that I read this to its very preachy ending.

In order to make a sci-fi horror story work, the author has to make the reader suspend belief. Stephen King is a master at pulling the reader into the most unbelievable stories. Dean Koontz failed miserably at pulling me in. After all these unbelievable twists and turns - ok, slight bends and veers - the ending which, read more like a sermon, was so disconnected from a horror story that it was laughable.

I've enjoyed reading many of Koontz' mystery/suspense books. But when it comes to horror stories penned by Koontz, I will spare myself a lot of misery by leaving those books safely on the bookshelf.

The Three Musketeers - A Tale of Boorish Swashbucklers

2007-10-03T12:58:00.000-04:00

Okay,as you can see from the title, I did not enjoy reading The Three Musketeers. I didn’t like any of the main characters.

Briefly, and as you probably know, the story revolves around the escapades of a young man, D’Artagnan who leaves his humble home seeking to become one of the King’s Musketeers. In a series of “mishaps” he causes problems for three of the musketeers, and is later befriended by them: Aramis, Porthos, and Athos. Duels, matters of honor, falling in and out of love, and trying to stay a step ahead of the evil Cardinal Richelieu and the equally evil Milady occupy D’Artagnan and the three musketeers. Some of their time is spent scheming how to get money to outfit themselves for battle. In those times, soldiers had to provide their own weaponry, uniforms, and if they could afford them, horses. Getting money from the wives of moneyed men, gambling, or hoodwinking people considered “beneath their station” seemed to be the preferred ways.

I’m not quarreling with Dumas’ ability to write. He was a great writer and he spun quite a tale. His gift for imagery is readily apparent. I was particularly struck by a passage near the end of the book in which he describes a desperate night ride during a storm. I enjoyed that passage.

“From time to time a broad sheet of lightning opened the horizon in its whole width, darted like a serpent over the black mass of trees, and like a terrible scimitar divided the heavens and the waters into two parts. Not a breath of wind now disturbed the heavy atmosphere. A deathlike silence oppressed all nature. The soil was humid and glittering with the rain which had recently fallen, and the refreshed herbs sent forth their perfume with additional energy.” (p 685)

There were other brief action scenes that I got caught up in. Dumas’ had an ability to build suspense. However, the sparse suspenseful scenes were not worth enduring the long, dull passages about these people I did not like.

For those interested in the history of France during the reign of King Louis XIII and Cardinal Richelieu, this may hold more interest. For instance, part of the action takes place during the battle of La Rochelle, in which the King’s forces attempted to crush the Huguenots. Ultimately, the King prevailed. The depiction of real people of the time, King Louis XIII, Cardinal Richelieu, Queen Anne (Anne of Austria), and the Duke of Buckingham George Villiers) might hold the Franco history buff’s interest.
.
The copy of the book I read contained notes to explain the references and pointed out the anachronisms provided by Barbara T Cooper, professor of French at the University of New Hampshire. Often, the notes were more interesting than the story. I found the them very helpful and it was interesting to learn the historical context of the action and the characters.

I did not find any of the main characters likeable. I realize the times were different. Knowing that didn’t help. D’Artagnan and his comrades were a product of their times. Crossing swords over an insult doesn’t appeal to me. Misogyny of the times doesn’t appeal to me. Women fell into two categories. They were either pure-hearted damsels in need of protection and a great deal of help or they were evil, scheming, vindictive devils set about bringing men down. More than once, the ills of mankind were attributed to the inborn lack of sense and ability of womankind.

I’ve read many novels set in times when the culture was not one I would have wanted to live in. For instance, this is the case with my favorite book, A Tale of Two Cities. I would not have wanted to live during those times. However, Dickens created characters the reader could care about, even admire. Their bravery was not borne solely from the culture of the times. It was that something deep within, it was human, it was universal. The main characters of The Three Musketeers had a bravery that was borne of the times, borne of vanity. I didn’t find them likeable. Dumas’ never made me care about them or what they were doing. I found much of what they were doing repugnant.

So there you have it. I don’t care that it is a classic. I did not enjoy reading it.

The Three Musketeers
By Alexandre Dumas
Publisher: Barnes & Noble Books
Published Date: December 2004
ISBN-13: 9781593081485
720pp
$8.95

The Time Traveler's Wife - A Short Book Review

2007-09-18T14:49:00.000-04:00

On October 26, 1991 twenty-year-old Clare Abshire met the love of her life at the Newberry Library in Chicago. She planned the meeting. She had spent endless hours with Henry DeTamble since she was a child. Yet, on that fall day Henry did not know Clare. He would not meet her until he was older and she much younger. Henry suffered from a new genetic disorder of the 20th century - time traveling.

Despite the distinctive science fiction premise of time traveling, Henry was not on a quest to change the past or the future in order to save the planet. This is not your traditional science fiction thriller. It's a love story, but not in the romance novel vein, either. Rather it is a well told story of enduring love.

Since each section begins with a subtitle stating the date and ages of Henry and Clare, the reader is not confused as the story unfolds in a most nonchronological order. The author uses this device well to pull the reader into the story, to make the reader care about Clare and Henry - warts and all. As the story unfolds, Clare and Henry and the reader seem like old friends and time traveling ceases to be a strange concept.

Time traveling does have its logistical problems. One in particular is that Henry can't bring anything with him, including the clothes on his back. This creates humorous as well as serious complications for him. It has also created a serious complication for some readers. Henry, the grown man, repeatedly travels to a meadow near Clare's house visiting her when she was a child. Sadly, some readers decided not to read the book once they realized this. Rest assured that there is nothing to worry about. Henry is not a pedophile. So go ahead and read this book. Get lost in the lives of Henry and Clare. Their story is intriguing, maddening, and poignant. You will want to discuss it with your friends. I invite you to discuss it here. Finally, you may well find yourself reading it a second time. I did.

The Time Traveler's Wife
By Audrey Niffeneger
A Harvest Book/ Harcourt, Inc
New York 2004
546 pages
Paperback - $14.00